We are delighted to inform our authors that the International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing (IJGHPC) has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s products and services. Beginning with all content published in 2016, IJGHPC will be indexed and abstracted in Thomson Reuter’s Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI). This means that articles published in the journal will be indexed in the Web of Science at the time of publication. We would invite you to submit high quality original/survey papers for publication consideration by IJGHPC. We would like to invite you to read the below articles of the latest issue of IJGHPC. International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing Vol. 8, No. 4, 2016 Published: Quarterly in Print and Electronically ISSN online: 1938-0267; ISSN print: 1938-0259; http://www.igi-global.com/journal/international-journal-grid-high-performance/1105 ------------------------------------------------------- =========================== IJGHPC Vol. 8 No. 4 (2016) =========================== http://www.igi-global.com/journal/international-journal-grid-high-performance/1105#contents Article 1, TVGuarder: A Trace-Enable Virtualization Protection Framework against Insider Threats for IaaS Environments (pages 1-20) Li Lin, Shuang Li, Bo Li, Jing Zhan, Yong Zhao Abstract: Cloud computing has a most vulnerable security concerns as virtualization. This paper presents a Trace-enable Virtualization protection framework named TVGuarder, which protects IaaS user's important data from being illegally accessed or maliciously damaged by insider attacks. A threat model is established to characterize cloud-oriented insider attacks and countermeasures are proposed in TVGuarder. First, LSM hooks in host OS kernel are leveraged to enforce that VM images could only be accessed by host virtualization service. Second, a trusted loading mechanism is proposed to prevent tampered or disguised virtualization process from being executed in Host OS. Third, a log-based back tracing mechanism is designed to record full call trace of VM operations and guarantee that only legitimate VM operations are allowed. TVGuarder has been implemented in Openstack platform and several comprehensive experiments are conducted. Experimental results show that TVGuarder can identify sev eral important insider attacks and protect virtual machine images with only a small performance degradation. Article 2, Dynamic Job Scheduling Strategy for Unreliable Nodes in a Volunteer Desktop Grid (pages 21-33) Shaik Naseera Abstract: Desktop grid aims to harvest a number of idle desktop computers owned by individuals on the edge of internet. Now days, Desktop grids are gaining increasing popularity because of the advances in the technology and availability of high computing power from the desktops. Volunteer nodes in a Desktop Grid encounter two types of failures: volatility failure and interference failure. Volatile failures are due to periodic maintenance, machine breakdown, system crash or shutdown etc that make node inaccessible to the Desktop Grid user. Interference failures are due to volunteer autonomic nature that the node owner can withdraw participation from public execution due to the need to execute the private jobs. This makes the node inaccessible to the Desktop Grid user and may cause partial or entire loss of the public job execution. Volunteer interferences cause slowdown in the execution of the jobs. In this paper the author present a job scheduling algorithm that analyze the nature of v olunteer interference failures for effective scheduling of jobs. Article 3, Hilbert Index-based Outlier Detection Algorithm in Metric Space (pages 34-54) Honglong Xu, Haiwu Rong, Rui Mao, Guoliang Chen, Zhiguang Shan Abstract: Big data is profoundly changing the lifestyles of people around the world in an unprecedented way. Driven by the requirements of applications across many industries, research on big data has been growing. Methods to manage and analyze big data to extract valuable information are the key of big data research. Starting from the variety challenge of big data, this dissertation proposes a universal big data management and analysis framework based on metric space. In this framework, the Hilbert Index-based Outlier Detection (HIOD) algorithm is proposed. HIOD can handle all datatypes that can be abstracted to metric space and achieve higher detection speed. Experimental results indicate that HIOD can effectively overcome the variety challenge of big data and achieves a 2.02 speed up over iORCA on average and, in certain cases, up to 5.57. The distance calculation times are reduced by 47.57% on average and up to 89.10%. Article 4, High Performance CGM-based Parallel Algorithms for the Optimal Binary Search Tree Problem (pages 55-77) Vianney Kengne Tchendji, Jean Frederic Myoupo, Gilles Dequen Abstract: In this paper, the authors highlight the existence of close relations between the execution time, efficiency and number of communication rounds in a family of CGM-based parallel algorithms for the optimal binary search tree problem (OBST). In this case, these three parameters cannot be simultaneously improved. The family of CGM (Coarse Grained Multicomputer) algorithms they derive is based on Knuth's sequential solution running in time and space, where n is the size of the problem. These CGM algorithms use p processors, each with local memory. In general, the authors show that each algorithms runs in with communications rounds. is the granularity of their model, and is a parameter that depends on and . The special case of yields a load-balanced CGM-based parallel algorithm with communication rounds and execution steps. Alternately, if , they obtain another algorithm with better execution time, say , the absence of any load-balancing and communication rounds, i.e., not better than the first algorithm. The authors show that the granularity has a crucial role in the different techniques they use to partition the problem to solve and study the impact of each scheduling algorithm. To the best of their knowledge, this is the first unified method to derive a set of parameter-dependent CGM-based parallel algorithms for the OBST problem. Article 5, A Two-Level Fuzzy Value-Based Replica Replacement Algorithm in Data Grids (pages 78-99) Nazanin Saadat, Amir Masoud Rahmani Abstract: One of the challenges of data grid is to access widely distributed data fast and efficiently and providing maximum data availability with minimum latency. Data replication is an efficient way used to address this challenge by replicating and storing replicas, making it possible to access similar data in different locations of the data grid and can shorten the time of getting the files. However, as the number and storage size of grid sites is limited and restricted, an optimized and effective replacement algorithm is needed to improve the efficiency of replication. In this paper, the authors propose a novel two-level replacement algorithm which uses Fuzzy Replica Preserving Value Evaluator System (FRPVES) for evaluating the value of each replica. The algorithm was tested using a grid simulator, OptorSim developed by European Data Grid projects. Results from simulation procedure show that the authors' proposed algorithm has better performance in comparison with other algorithms in terms of job execution time, total number of replications and effective network usage. Article 6, MR-LDA: An Efficient Topic Model for Classification of Short Text in Big Social Data (pages 100-113) Xiongwen Pang, Benshuai Wan, Huifang Li, Weiwei Lin Abstract: Latent Dirichlet Allocation(LDA) is an efficient method of text mining,but applying LDA directly to Chinese micro-blog texts will not work well because micro-blogs are more social, brief, and closely related with each other. Based on LDA, this paper proposes a Micro-blog Relation LDA model (MR-LDA), which takes the relations between Chinese micro-blog documents and other Chinese micro-blog documents into consideration to help topic mining in micro-blog. The authors extend LDA in the following two points. First, they aggregate several Chinese micro-blogs as a single micro-blog document to solve the problem of short texts. Second, they model the generation process of Chinese micro-blogs more accurately by taking relationship between micro-blog documents into consideration. MR-LDA is more suitable to model Chinese micro-blog data. Gibbs sampling method is borrowed to inference the model. Experimental results on actual datasets show that MR-LDA model can offer an effective soluti on to text mining for Chinese micro-blog. === About IJGHPC === The International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing (IJGHPC) examines current, state-of-the art research on all aspects of grid and cloud evolution, middleware, standards, API, economy, education, services, algorithms, collaboration, impact, instrumentation, security, portals, trends, challenges, models, work flow management, wireless systems, and high performance computing. This journal will be instrumental in the improvement and development of theory and practice in grid and cloud computing. === Indices === Thomson Reuter’s Emerging Sources Citation Index, SCOPUS, Compendex EI, DBLP, INSPEC, ACM Digital Library, etc. === CALL FOR PAPERS === The IJGHPC invites renowned researchers from various branches of the field to submit manuscripts for publication in the journal. Accepted papers of IJGHPC will undergo language copyediting, typesetting, and reference validation in order to provide the highest publication quality. Note: There are no submission or publication fees for manuscripts submitted to the International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing (IJGHPC). === IJGHPC Coverage === Topics of interest include: -Advanced collaboration techniques and scaling issues -Algorithms and techniques for HPC -Big Data -Bio-inspired grid resource management -Cloud architectures -Cloud business process integration -Cloud client and applications -Cloud engineering and management -Cloud foundation concepts -Cloud platforms and infrastructures -Cloud reliability and security -Cloud Services -Cloud standards -Cloud types -Combating global terrorism with the world wide grid -Emerging standards for organizations and international projects -Future of grid, trends, and challenges -Green data centers -Grid and software engineering aspects -Grid architecture, resources, and data management -Grid economy, market dynamics, and simulations -Grid education and applications - science, engineering, and business -Grid evolution, characterization, and concepts -Grid fundamentals, algorithms, and performance analysis -Grid impact, scientific, and industrial and social implications -Grid instrumentation, measurement, and visualization -Grid middleware, scheduling, brokering, and monitoring -Grid portals and security -Grid programming, models, tools, and API -Grid services, concepts, specifications, and frameworks -Grid uses and emerging technology -New initiatives, SOA, autonomic computing, and semantic grid -Simple API for Grid Applications (SAGA) -Software and hardware support for HPC -Test, evaluation, and certificate presentation -Wireless and optical grid, characteristics, and applications -Work flow management === Special Issue === Experienced researchers and practitioners are welcome to propose, organize, and guest edit special section (3-4 papers) / issue (6-8 papers) around topics of their interest and expertise. Once you propose a Special Issue (SI), you will be the Lead Guest Editor of the Special Issue. We look forward to your stimulating proposals and working with you in ensuring the SI bright. We will be pleased to assist with all questions on the organization of a Special Issue to its publication. Enquiries and special issue proposals should be directed to the editor Prof. Robert Hsu at chh@chu.edu.tw === Latest Published Articles === Vol. 8, No. 4 (2016) *************** Article 1 TVGuarder: A Trace-Enable Virtualization Protection Framework against Insider Threats for IaaS Environments (pages 1-20) Article 2 Dynamic Job Scheduling Strategy for Unreliable Nodes in a Volunteer Desktop Grid (pages 21-33) Article 3 Hilbert Index-based Outlier Detection Algorithm in Metric Space (pages 34-54) Article 4 High Performance CGM-based Parallel Algorithms for the Optimal Binary Search Tree Problem (pages 55-77) Article 5 A Two-Level Fuzzy Value-Based Replica Replacement Algorithm in Data Grids (pages 78-99) Article 6 MR-LDA: An Efficient Topic Model for Classification of Short Text in Big Social Data (pages 100-113) Vol. 8, No. 3 (2016) *************** Article 1 Fragment Re-Allocation Strategy Based on Hypergraph for NoSQL Database Systems (pages 1-23) Article 2 Publish/Subscribe and JXTA based Cloud Service Management with QoS (pages 24-37) Article 3 A Credible Cloud Service Model based on Behavior Graphs and Tripartite Decision-Making Mechanism (pages 38-56) Article 4 An Intelligent Approval System for City Construction based on Cloud Computing and Big Data (pages 57-69) Article 5 Efficient Querying Distributed Big-XML Data using MapReduce (pages 70-79) Vol. 8, No. 2 (2016) *************** Article 1 Software-Defined Networking for Scalable Cloud-based Services to Improve System Performance of Hadoop-based Big Data Applications (pages 1-22) Article 2 Discovering Gathering Pattern Using a Taxicab Service Rate Analysis Method based on Neural Network (pages 23-42) Article 3 An Energy-Efficient Resource Scheduling Algorithm for Cloud Computing based on Resource Equivalence Optimization (pages 43-57) Article 4 Towards High Performance Text Mining: A TextRank-based Method for Automatic Text Summarization (pages 58-75) Article 5 Extending Dynamic Scheduling Policies in WorkflowSim by Using Variance based Approach (pages 76-93) Article 6 Game Theoretic Cloud-Assisted Opportunistic Spectrum Access in Cognitive Radio Networks (pages 94-110) Vol. 8, No. 1 (2016) *************** Article 1 Architectural Pattern for Scheduling Multi-Component Applications in Distributed Systems (pages 1-22) Article 2 Interflow Network Coding Approaches for Data Heterogeneous Unicast Sessions in Wireless Networks (pages 23-37) Article 3 Novel Software Containers for Engineering and Scientific Simulations in the Cloud (pages 38-49) Article 4 Using the Balanced Scorecard Approach to Appraise the Performance of Cloud Computing (pages 50-57) Article 5 Adapting Reproducible Research Capabilities to Resilient Distributed Calculations (pages 58-69) Article 6 Migrating to the Cloud: The Sullivan University Experience (pages 70-75) Article 7 An Intelligent Power Load Control/Switching System Using an Energy Meter and Relay Circuit (pages 76-84) Article 8 Web Services Gateway: Taking Advantage of the Cloud (pages 85-92) Vol. 7, No. 4 (2015) *************** Article 1 MDE Approach for the Establishment of a Service Level Agreements Monitoring by Trusted Third Party in the Cloud Computing (pages 1-20) Article 2 Review of Big Data on Student Information for Finding the Uncertainty in Higher Education Enrollment (pages 21-32) Article 3 An Enhanced TCP for Optimizing Channel Utilization in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (pages 33-46) Article 4 Performance Comparison of Classification Methods for Surface EMG-Based Human-Machine Interface (pages 47-56) Article 5 Constructing a Bioinformatics Platform with Web and Mobile Services Based on NVIDIA Jetson TK1 (pages 57-73) Article 6 Efficient Resource Allocation Mechanism for Federated Clouds (pages 74-87) Vol. 7, No. 3 (2015) *************** Article 1 Automatic Dynamic Data Structures Recognition to Support the Migration of Applications to the Cloud (pages 1-22) Article 2 Maintaining Replicated Recovery Log for RESTful Services (pages 23-35) Article 3 A Mobile Cloud Computing System for Mathematical Computation (pages 36-53) Article 4 High Performance Temperature Detection System for Industrial Automation (pages 54-64) Article 5 Self-Adaptive QoS-Aware Web Service Discovery using Ontology Approach (pages 65-84) Article 6 High Performance Datafly based Anonymity Algorithm and Its L-Diversity (pages 85-100) Vol. 7, No. 2 (2015) *************** Article 1 Independent Tasks Scheduling using Parallel PSO in Multiprocessor Systems (pages 1-17) Article 2 Exploring Vectorization and Prefetching Techniques on Scientific Kernels and Inferring the Cache Performance Metrics (pages 18-36) Article 3 An Anonymous Email Identification Solution based on Writing Structural Patterns (pages 37-49) Article 4 A Novel Multi-Dimension Resource Recycling Mechanism for Cloud Data Centers (pages 50-64) Article 5 A Self-Adaptive Prediction Algorithm for Cloud Workloads (pages 65-76) Article 6 Apriori-based High Efficiency Load Balancing Parallel Data Mining Algorithms on Multi-core Architectures (pages 77-99) Vol. 7, No. 1 (2015) *************** Article 1: Tag-Based Classification for Software-Defined Networking Article 2: Software Defined Cognitive Radio Network Framework: Design and Evaluation Article 3: Toward a Proof of Concept Implementation of a Cloud Infrastructure on the Blue Gene/Q Article 4: Black Hole Traffic Anomaly Detections in Wireless Sensor Network Article 5: Contention-Free Station Communication Matching Algorithm in Multi-Hop Power Management for Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks Vol. 6, No. 4 (2014) *************** Article 1: Energy Efficiency Oriented Scheduling for Heterogeneous Cloud Systems Article 2: Analyzing the Cooling Efficiency of the Thermal Environment in Data Centers Article 3: QoS Oriented Enhancement based on the Analysis of Dynamic Job Scheduling in HPC Article 4: Methodology for Information Management and Data Assessment in Cloud Environments Article 5: Ambulance Dispatching System with Integrated Information and Communication Technologies on Cloud Environment Vol. 6, No. 3 (2014) *************** Article 1: EcoGrid: A Toolkit for Modelling and Simulation of Grid Computing Environment for Evaluation of Resource Management Algorithms Article 2: Accelerating a Cloud-Based Software GNSS Receiver Article 3: Workload Prediction on Google Cluster Trace Article 4: A Generic Privacy Breach Preventing Methodology for Cloud Based Web Service Vol. 6, No. 2 (2014) *************** Article 1: Semantic-Based Access Control for Data Resources in Open Grid Services Architecture: Data Access and Integration (OGSA-DAI) Article 2: A Migration Approach for Fault Tolerance in Cloud Computing Article 3: Cryptographic Cloud Computing Environment as a More Trusted Communication Environment Article 4: Green Energy Model for Grid Resource Allocation: A Graph Theoretic Approach Article 5: An Efficient CGM-Based Parallel Algorithm Solving the Matrix Chain Ordering Problem Vol. 6, No. 1 (2014) *************** Article 1: Adjusting Thread Parallelism Dynamically to Accelerate Dynamic Programming with Irregular Workload Distribution on GPGPUs Article 2: Computing Traffic Information in the Cloud Article 3: On Construction of a Multi-Grid Resource Selection Strategy on Grids Article 4: Novel Resource Allocation Algorithm for Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing in Heterogeneous Environment Article 5: Architecting Software as a Service for Data Centric Cloud Applications === Complete Journal Contents Listing:=== http://www.igi-global.com/journal-contents/international-journal-grid-high-performance/1105 === IJGHPC Editorial Board === Co-EiC Robert Hsu, Chung Hua University, Taiwan Emmanuel Udoh, Sullivan University, USA EB Members Amy Apon, Clemson University, USA Nik Bessis, University of Bedfordshire, UK Wolfgang Gentzsch, HPC, Grid, and Cloud Computing Consultant, Germany Daniel Katz, University of Chicago, USA Stan Kurkovsky, Central Connecticut State University, USA Antanas Zilinskas, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Lithuania Vishal Anand, The College at Brockport, State University of New York, USA Nick Antonopoulos, University of Derby, UK Giovanni Aloisio, University of Salento, Italy Jose Manuel Garcia Carrasco, Universidad de Murcia, Spain Christophe Cerin, University of Paris 13, France I-hsin Chung, IBM Research, USA Yeh-Ching Chung, National Tsinghua University, Taiwan Yuhui Deng, Jinan University, China Shanmugasundaram Hariharan, TRP Engineering College (SRM Group), India Shih-Hao Hung, National Taiwan University, Taiwan Minglu Li, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China Berniamino Martino, Seconda Universita 'di Napoli, Italy Kashif Nisar, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia Shawulu Nggada, Polytechnic of Namibia, Namibia Pethuru Raj, IBM India Private Limited, Bangalore, India Manpreet Singh, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, India Chen Tian, Huawei Technologies, USA Giuseppe Trunfio, University of Sassari, Italy Athina Vakali, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Chao Wang, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA Fatos Xhafa, Universitat Politecnica de Cataluyna, Spain Chao-Tung Yang, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan Laurence Yang, St. Francis Xavier University, Canada Zhifeng Yun, Louisiana State University, USA Weizhe Zhang, Harbin Institute and Technology, China Yao Zhang, Argonne National Laboratory, USA Horvath Zoltan, Eovos Lorand Tudomanyegyetem, Hungary
Thursday, December 1, 2016
International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing
Why Everything You Know About Cancer Is Wrong
Why Everything You Know About Cancer Is Wrong
Written by Webster Kehr, Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. | Last updated on June 22, 2016
Written by Webster Kehr, Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. | Last updated on June 22, 2016
Introduction
Many people think that cancer is caused by DNA damage and
that not even God can cure cancer. Both of these assumptions are pure
nonsense. Most likely everything you know about cancer was intentionally
designed to deceive you so that cancer patients will choose the wrong
cancer treatments.
Why would someone spread false information about cancer? That is what this article is about.
Let us start with a three-question test:
Question #1: What Causes a Cell To Be Cancerous?
Question #2: What is the 5-year “cure rate” of orthodox medicine, meaning what percent of their cancer patients are alive 5 years after diagnosis?
Question #3: What is the 5-year “cure rate” of several of the best-known natural cancer treatment experts?
Question #2: What is the 5-year “cure rate” of orthodox medicine, meaning what percent of their cancer patients are alive 5 years after diagnosis?
Question #3: What is the 5-year “cure rate” of several of the best-known natural cancer treatment experts?
Think about your answers before reading on.
Most people think that cancer is caused by DNA damage and that orthodox medicine is frantically searching for a cure for cancer.
There are two problems with these beliefs. Both beliefs are
complete nonsense and come from the propaganda and deceptions of
television.
Cancer is not caused by DNA damage. The definition of a
cancer cell is a cell with low ATP energy (i.e. a low level of adenosine
triphosphate). It is difficult to imagine a cell biologist who is so
stupid they think that DNA damage can cause low levels of ATP energy.
Only a very, very small fraction of DNA has anything to do with the
creation of ATP energy.
Yet the media glorifies all of the “cancer researchers” who
are diligently trying to “fix” the DNA damage of cancer cells. It is
all a scam to make sure that cures for cancer are never found.
The truth is that there are many people who know how to
cure cancer. They just don’t work for the pharmaceutical industry and
you don’t hear about them in the media and they don’t win Nobel Prizes.
The low ATP level is actually caused by microbes which are
inside the cancer cells, generally Helicobacter Pylori. This is an
amazing microbe which can have 16 different sizes and shapes and sizes
depending on the pH it is exposed to.
Advanced Cancer Theory
Advanced Cancer Theory
This microbe intercepts glucose as it enters the cancer
cells and thus reduces the amount of glucose available to be converted
into pyruvate. With less pyruvate the cell will create less ATP energy
(or course I am skipping many steps in this process). For a more
detailed discussion see this article:
What Causes Cancer
What Causes Cancer
The ICRF has developed more than 20 cancer treatments which
revert the cancer cells into normal cells. How do they revert cancer
cells into normal cells? They safely target and kill the microbes inside
the cancer cells.
Killing cancer cells is “old school” but there is nothing
wrong with things thatcan safely target and kill cancer cells (such as
purple grape juice), but the new approach is to kill the microbes inside
the cancer cells. This was first done in the 1930s but that technology
was persecuted and shut down by the FDA and AMA. It has been restored,
however, by the High RF Frequency Devices (which are not their real
name, which we cannot use on this website due to the FDA).
Let’s talk about cure rates.
About Cure Rates
You probably think that orthodox medicine (e.g. the
pharmaceutical industry, oncologists, the American Medical Association
or AMA, etc.) has a 5-year cure rate for cancer patients of more than
50%. A “5-year cure rate” would mean, by definition, that 50% or more of
their cancer patients are still alive 5-years after being diagnosed
with cancer.
You probably think that the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) is not only doing its best to find cures for cancer, but are
shutting down “quacks” who are pretending to cure cancer but in fact do
not know how to cure cancer.
You probably think that the media is constantly looking for
who has the best cure rates for cancer so the media’s investigative
journalists can keep the general public apprised of who has the most
effective cancer treatments.
And so on.
Are your assumptions correct? NO.
Cure rates are not an academic issue because you, the
reader, may get cancer some day or you may know someone who gets cancer,
such as a spouse or relative. Your very life, or the life of a friend
of loved-one, may be on the line as you decide who is telling the truth
about cancer research.
Choosing a cancer treatment is literally a life-and-death
decision. The “cure rates” for different cancer treatments can range
from 3% to 95% for the same type of cancer. So who is telling the truth
and who is lying? And if they are lying, why are they lying?
So let’s talk about cure rates.
First, what is the overall 5-year cure rate of the oncology profession according to their own statistics?
Second, what was the cure rate of a South African immigrant who used nothing but purple grape juice to treat cancer?
Before reading on, take a guess at the answers to both of these questions and write your answers down to see how you did.
The answer to the first question is this: the 5-year cure rate of orthodox medicine (e.g. oncologists) is 2.1%.
+. See this article which came from an oncology journal:
Oncology Journal
Oncology Journal
This means the “cure rate” for the pharmaceutical industry
(which controls Congress and the FDA and is in bed with the AMA) is
2.1%.
This means the 5-year “cure rate” of Congress is 2.1%.
This means the 5-year “cure rate” of the FDA is 2.1%.
This means the 5-year “cure rate” of the AMA is 2.1%.
This means the 5-year cure rate for oncologists, who use FDA approved protocols, is 2.1%.
This means the 5-year cure rate of the media (which is why almost all newly-diagnosed cancer patients use chemotherapy, radiation and surgery), is 2.1%. (Note: the media glorifies medical doctors on television in every way possible so when a patient is sick they run to a medical doctor and do whatever he or she recommends)
This means the 5-year “cure rate” of the FDA is 2.1%.
This means the 5-year “cure rate” of the AMA is 2.1%.
This means the 5-year cure rate for oncologists, who use FDA approved protocols, is 2.1%.
This means the 5-year cure rate of the media (which is why almost all newly-diagnosed cancer patients use chemotherapy, radiation and surgery), is 2.1%. (Note: the media glorifies medical doctors on television in every way possible so when a patient is sick they run to a medical doctor and do whatever he or she recommends)
“Everyone should know that the ‘war on cancer’ is largely a fraud.”
Linus Pauling, PhD, Two Time Nobel Prize Winner
As if that weren’t bad enough, some chemical companies are dedicated to making you sick so that you will need prescription drugs. For example, Monsanto loves to put chemicals in your foods and loves for you to eat GMO foods. Like many others, the owners of the chemical companies think that God is stupid and they think that they are superior to God. I have some really bad news for these people, God is not dead and he definitely is not stupid.
Linus Pauling, PhD, Two Time Nobel Prize Winner
As if that weren’t bad enough, some chemical companies are dedicated to making you sick so that you will need prescription drugs. For example, Monsanto loves to put chemicals in your foods and loves for you to eat GMO foods. Like many others, the owners of the chemical companies think that God is stupid and they think that they are superior to God. I have some really bad news for these people, God is not dead and he definitely is not stupid.
Can the scientists at Monsanto design DNA for a new
species? No. But God has designed the DNA for every species of animal
and plant on this planet. This includes the DNA of human males and human
females. You see the DNA of human males and human females must align in
a very special way so their children will have features of both the
father and mother.
No one at Monsanto or the FDA or at any pharmaceutical company could design the DNA of a cockroach.
The answer to the second question is this: Johnana Brandt’s
cure rate was 100%. God designed the DNA for purple grapes so that they
could cure cancer.
Orthodox medicine cannot cure cancer, yet the cure rate for
Johanna Brandt, who did not have a single day of a single class in
medical school, was 100%.
Johanna Brandt did not need to know how to cure cancer,
Mother Nature had to know how to cure cancer. And Mother Nature had put
at least 12 chemicals in purple grape juice that can kill cancer cells.
The best way to survive cancer is to figure out what Mother Nature has already done.
(Natural Medicine) Dr. Kelley’s Cancer Treatments
Another natural medicine cancer researcher was Dr. William
D. Kelley, DDS, was a dentist turned natural medicine cancer researcher.
He worked with more than 30,000 cancer patients using his protocol.
Dr. Kelley had a cure rate of 93% on his newly diagnosed cancer patients who had not had chemotherapy, radiation or surgery.
Dr. Kelley was thrown in jail and later went to Mexico to treat cancer patients.
Why did he go to jail? Because he used products to treat
cancer which cannot be patented. Thus, the pharmaceutical industry and
medical community had no interest in his treatments because they cannot
make huge profits from treatments that cannot be patented.
So they had him thrown in jail. They did not care that he
had a 93% cure rate, his treatments were not profitable enough to
satisfy their greed.
Dr. Kelly used cancer treatments designed by God, meaning
Mother Nature, such as natural enzymes. These enzymes made the cancer
cells visible to the immune system and the immune system cured the
cancer. The enzymes were natural and could not be patented.
In other words, Dr. Kelly was not a medical doctor and he
used natural medicine to achieve his 93% cure rate. Using Mother Nature
is an unforgivable sin according to the AMA and the media. His cure rate
was irrelevant. Dr. Kelley died on January 30, 2005 at the age of 79.
So let’s talk about today.
Today, the instant someone hears the term “natural
medicine” they immediately run out the door as fast as they can run. But
they are running away from the only highly effective cancer treatments.
Mother Nature is a lot smarter than any chemist.
Many people have cured their newly diagnosed cancer by
using a very healthy diet and drinking a quart of carrot juice (with a
little beet juice mixed in) every day. That is all they did.
In fact, if all cancer patients did that, instead of using
chemotherapy, radiation and surgery, the “cure rate” for cancer in
America would jump dramatically.
But who would make huge profits telling cancer patients to
drink a quart of carrot juice, mixed with a little beet juice, every
day, and eat a healthy diet?? Certainly not the medical community and
certainly not the pharmaceutical industry and media. Carrot juice and
beet juice cannot be patented. Nor can a healthy diet be patented.
The general public is so brainwashed they think that God
(i.e. Mother Nature) is too stupid to be a medial doctor. Never mind the
fact that God designed 100% of the DNA of carrots, beets, and human
DNA. Scientists only understand about 3% of human DNA after studying it
since 1953.
In fact, scientists still don’t have a clue what 97% of all
human DNA does. They used to call it “junk DNA” because they were too
stupid to understand what it did. They still have no clue but they no
longer call it “junk DNA.”
All of the disbelief in Mother Nature is the result of the
carefully designed brainwashing by the media. By constantly glorifying
medical doctors the general public thinks that God is too stupid to be a
medical doctor. This brainwashing is because Mother Nature doesn’t have
a checking account, so the media ignores Her and glorifies those who
have huge checking accounts.
There are many other examples of natural cancer researchers who also had very high cure rates.
Dr. Philip Binzel, MD had an 81% cure rate using liquid
laetrile from apricot seeds. He got liquid laetrile from Mexico. The
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tried to block the import of liquid
laetrile into the United States. Fortunately, Dr. Binzel’s son was an
attorney and the FDA was defeated in court.
Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, had a 100% cure rate
using electromedicine to kill microbes inside the cancer cells. The
American Medical Association (AMA) tried to buy him out. Rife refused so
the FDA shut him down and destroyed his lab and inventory.
And there are many others. In fact, the best cancer
researchers ever are all alive today. We have had to develop very
advanced cancer protocols because many of the patients we work with are
very sick due to their starting their cancer treatment with orthodox
cancer treatments.
All of the above natural technologies are currently used.
The “Rife Machine” is now called a High RF Frequency
Generator-Contact (15 watts) or High RF Frequency Generator-Plasma (207
watts).
Well, that is not their real names. We are not allowed by
the vendor to mention their real names. I will bet by now you can figure
out why the vendor does not want us to use the real names of these
devices. He is afraid of the FDA.
Natural medicine cancer researchers today use many of the
above protocols, but newer products and newer combinations of products
have made some of the above protocols obsolete if used by themselves.
A powerful combination of natural cancer treatments and electromedicine are needed by cancer patients.
That is why the experts put together protocols with names
like: Cellect-Budwig, Dirt Cheap Protocol, Photon Protocol, Cesium
Chloride, etc.
What the Media Doesn’t Tell You About Cancer
The media has conditioned the American people to believe
that cancer is caused by DNA damage and that not even God can figure out
how to cure cancer.
Oh good grief, what idiot would believe that. God designed
human DNA and the DNA for all other species, yet people think that God
is not smart enough to cure cancer. If God designed DNA then certainly
He knows how to cure cancer..
But surprisingly, DNA damage has absolutely nothing to do
with causing cancer. But even if it did – so what? If you safely target
and kill the cancer cells, what difference would it make that the cancer
cells have DNA damage?
A Nobel Prize was awarded in 1930/31 for the discovery that low ATP energy was the definition of a cancer cell.
But it was a natural medicine cancer researcher (who
obviously did not win a Nobel Prize) who discovered that the low ATP
energy was caused by microbes inside the cancer cells which intercept
glucose before it can be converted into pyruvate and then, via two
chemical cycles, into ATP.
By killing these microbes, cancer cells can be reverted
into normal cells. We now know it is not even necessary to kill cancer
cells, they can be reverted into normal cells. The ICRF (Independent
Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. – natural medicine researchers) has
developed more than 25 treatments that revert cancer cells into normal
cells.
The DNA damage in cancer cells has absolutely nothing to do
with causing cancer. The DNA damage is caused by the same thing that
causes the cancer – the microbes inside the cancer cells.
There are many cures for cancer. But these cures do not
come from the pharmaceutical industry. The
multi-billionaires/trillionaires who own the pharmaceutical industry
have zero interest in the “little people” surviving their cancer.
The politicians, of course, side with the trillionaires
because they are the ones who own the media and thus they are the ones
who own the minds of the American people. You cannot get elected to the
White House without selling out to the super-rich.
Cures for cancer must come from cancer researchers who have
integrity and do not work for the pharmaceutical industry or Food and
Drug Administration (Congress has given the FDA to the pharmaceutical
industry as a gift to crush anyone who can cure a highly profitable
disease) or any of the large cancer charities (which are controlled by
the pharmaceutical industry).
The American Cancer Society and Susan G. Komen For The Cure
have no interest in curing cancer. They are collecting money. In fact,
the American Cancer Society was really founded by John D. Rockefeller,
Jr. – the son of the founder of the pharmaceutical industry.
No wonder the ACS has never found a cure for cancer. They
have never been looking for a cure for cancer and they never will. If
the ACS hired one of the ICRF researchers they would have over 25 cures
for cancer within one week. But that will never happen.
The problem with curing cancer has nothing to do with
science and everything to do with politics and information. People are
told there are no cures for cancer, over and over, so they naturally
believe it.
But it is a lie.
Actually, curing cancer is easy and many people know how to cure cancer.
See this article on ways to revert cancer cells into normal cells:
Revert Cancer Cells Into Normal Cells
Revert Cancer Cells Into Normal Cells
Why is it so hard to get people to believe the truth.
Because they have been led astray by so many people for so long. Some of
these people know the truth (that there are cures for cancer) but they
don’t want others to know about them. But others do not know the truth.
The battle against cancer has nothing to do with cancer and
everything to do with the manipulation of information by the
super-rich.
The media uses a very sophisticated brainwashing tactic
that has been around for many decades. Study this brilliant quote five
or ten times:
“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object
of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to
produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace
of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring
dissonance.”
Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives, Alan Bullock
By using the constant repetition of seeing “medical doctors” on television, people are conditioned (the “uniform pattern of public utterance“) to believe that anyone who is not a “medical doctor” must be a quack (the “jarring dissonance“).
Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives, Alan Bullock
By using the constant repetition of seeing “medical doctors” on television, people are conditioned (the “uniform pattern of public utterance“) to believe that anyone who is not a “medical doctor” must be a quack (the “jarring dissonance“).
Thus, people run to their medical doctor, who has a 3% cure rate, when they get cancer. The media has done their job well.
Almost every time you turn on your television set you see a
medical doctor being glorified. Why? So that when people are diagnosed
with cancer, by a medical doctor, they will immediately want to know
which medical doctors treat cancer.
This process has been going on for many years, long before
you were born or television was invented. The Big Cartel of the media,
the pharmaceutical industry, the politicians, the medical industry, etc.
don’t want people to know that cancer can be cured.
The secret cartels use the media to turn people into
zombies. Thus, when a person is diagnosed with cancer they head for an
oncologist like a robot.
But we are the children of God and God wants us to be
happy. But the “super rich” don’t want the “little people” to be happy,
they want the money of the “little people” as the “little people” are
dying of cancer.
Thanks to: http://www.whale.to
Because there are many cures for cancer in Mother Nature,
the super-rich, who own the pharmaceutical industry and the media, make
sure that no human being in America, or in any other country, knows or
believes that there are, in fact, scores of ways to cure cancer using
natural medicine, meaning medicine from Mother Nature (i.e. God).
Personally, I like to revert cancer cells into normal
cells. Cancer cells are sick. Why kill them? How barbaric. Why not
revert them into normal cells?? But many natural treatments do kill
cancer cells. Since cancer cells are only a small percent of the cells
in the body of a cancer patient, I guess it is OK to kill them.
But safely targeting cancer cells and killing cancer cells,
or safely reverting cancer cells into normal cells, is not even
remotely on the agenda of Big Pharma or Big Medicine or Big Media or Big
Corrupt Politicians or Big Charities. But suppressing these cures is
one of their highest priorities.
So what is on the radar of Big Pharma, ad nauseum? Profits,
and lots of them. Curing cancer patients is literally the last thing on
their radar.
But natural medicine cancer researchers have been curing cancer for many decades.
For example, Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, had a 100%
cure rate on cancer by reverting cancer cells into normal cells. He did
this in the 1930s by using gentle electrical currents (which is one form
of “electromedicine”) to kill the microbes which are inside the cancer
cells.
It is microbes inside the cancer cells that are blocking
the production of ATP energy. Killing these microbes is what allows
cancer cells to be reverted into normal cells.
The American Medical Association (AMA) tried to “buy Rife
out” so they could destroy his machines. Rife refused their “offer” so
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) shut him down and destroyed all
of his lab and his machines that had not already been sold.
You probably didn’t know about Dr. Rife because the media
has never told you about his 100% cure rate. The media has also not told
you that his device has been replicated using modern technology and
that you can buy these devices over the Internet.
To learn about these devices see the column of links on the
left side of every page and look for the link called: “High RF
Frequency Protocol” in the “Complete Protocols” section. Detailed
instructions are available from the vendor recommended by this website,
even if you do not buy the device from him.
The truth is that the media (e.g. television, magazines,
etc.), the medical cartel and the cancer researchers who create the
drugs which have a 3% cure rate, all work for, or work for organizations
which are in bed with, the pharmaceutical industry. Do you see a
pattern here? Wherever the pharmaceutical industry has control, a less
than 3% cure rate results.
The truth is that the 2.1% cure rate is inexcusable. And
suppressing cures that have 93% and above cure rates is even more
abominable.
But Dr. Rife is just the tip of the iceberg of things you don’t know.
Dr. William D. Kelley, a cancer researcher who was not
controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, worked with more than 33,000
cancer patients. His highly documented five-year cure rate on newly
diagnosed cancer patients was about 93%. Dr. Kelley didn’t care about
DNA damage, he figured out how to safely target and kill the sick cancer
cells using natural enzymes. Actually, the immune system killed the
cancer cells in his protocol.
Do the math, a 93% cure rate (of Dr. Kelley) minus about a
3% cure rate is a 90% difference. That is why you need to know who the
cancer researchers are working for, either directly or indirectly – Big
Pharma or Mother Nature.
Dr. Kelley was not controlled by the pharmaceutical
industry or its private police force: the Food an Drug Administration
(FDA). In fact, the FDA threw Dr. Kelley in jail.
Dr. Kelley died in 2005 and detailed information about his
cancer treatments have been public for more than a decade. His treatment
is not a mystery, just buy his book on Amazon (Cancer: Curing the
Incurable Without Surgery, Chemotherapy or Radiation). Or see the
original book:
One Answer To Cancer
One Answer To Cancer
Note: The Kelley Protocol is no longer one of the major
cancer treatments in natural medicine, due to newer technologies, though
it is frequently added to the newer and more powerful protocol.
The Media Iceberg
So why hasn’t the media told you about Dr. Rife and Dr.
Kelley and many others? Why haven’t all of the media’s high-powered
“investigative journalists” told their viewers about Dr. Kelley? Do
these “journalists” not know how to read or search the Internet? What
are they looking for – lost cats? Maybe someone should tell them about
Google.
Did it ever occur to anyone that the “investigative
journalists” are not allowed to investigate the media because they work
for the media. If the media is part of a cover-up, how are people going
to find out? And who is going to believe there is a cover-up?
The media is like an iceberg. They tell you 10% of the
truth and they bury they other 90% of the truth. You need a scuba tank
to find the truth. The media tells you what they want you to hear, not
what you need to hear.
Consider the words to this well-known song:
And when you trust your television
What you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
Oh, they can bend it all they want
John Mayer: “Waiting on the World to Change”
When someone comes along and tells something truthful about what is beneath the water, you won’t believe it. In fact, if you have read this far on this web page, pat yourself on the back because you are a rare person.
What you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
Oh, they can bend it all they want
John Mayer: “Waiting on the World to Change”
When someone comes along and tells something truthful about what is beneath the water, you won’t believe it. In fact, if you have read this far on this web page, pat yourself on the back because you are a rare person.
Why hasn’t the American Medical Association forced their
members to use Dr. Kelley’s cancer treatments? The AMA certainly knows
about Dr. Kelly’s treatments because they, along with the Food and Drug
Administration, had Kelley thrown in jail because he was curing cancer,
cutting into their profits and making them look bad.
Why hasn’t the American Cancer Society and the Susan G.
Komen Foundation, ad nauseum, used their massive contributions and their
clout in the media to tell the world about Dr. Kelley’s cancer
treatments? Why are they looking for 3% cure rate treatments when there
are already cancer treatments with 93% cure rates?
In fact, there are only two cancer research organizations
on this planet which teach about, and research, Dr. Rife’s and Dr.
Kelley’s protocols: the Independent Cancer Research Foundation (which
runs this website) and the American Anti-Cancer Institute in Washington
state.
Obviously, both of these cancer research organizations are
very, very small because the media never talks about them because they
refuse to jump in bed with the pharmaceutical industry. Contributions to
these cancer research organizations are measured in hundreds of dollars
a month, not millions of dollars a month.
Why haven’t the state medical boards forced the doctors in their states to use Dr. Kelley’s cancer treatments?
Why don’t the health insurance companies pay for the
medical expenses of the cancer patients who use Dr. Kelley’s cancer
treatments? It would save their members billions of dollars a year.
Why hasn’t Congress passed a law forcing all medical professionals to use the cancer treatments of Dr. Kelley?
Why hasn’t the President of the United States ordered the
Veteran’s Administration hospitals to use Dr. Kelley’s cancer
treatments?
The reason is that everyone is looking for the
most profitable cancer treatments, not the most effective cancer
treatments. And the pharmaceutical industry has the most profitable
cancer treatments. And everyone wants to be fed by Big Pharma.
Is there anybody on this planet who hasn’t sold out to the pharmaceutical industry?
Those who have sold-out to the pharmaceutical industry
include the media (which may largely be owned by the owners of the
pharmaceutical industry), the movie companies, Congress, the White
House, the American Cancer Society, the Susan G. Komen Foundation, the
state medical boards, the American Medical Association, the health
insurance companies, etc. etc. etc.
The health insurance companies are not allowed by the state
insurance departments to write health insurance policies that pay the
same percent for natural medicine cancer treatments as they allow to pay
for orthodox cancer treatments. That is how deep the corruption and
stupidity goes in the U.S.
The High Society Clubs
The most important group in the above list is the media.
They have the power to expose the corruption in medicine, politics, etc.
But they don’t because they also want a piece of the pie and they are
owned by the multi-billionaires.
The media receives many millions of dollars every year from
the drug companies in advertising revenue. It is these same drug
companies which sell the drugs which generate the highly profitable 3%
cure rate of modern medicine.
How are people going to hear that fact?? Ponder that carefully.
Need I even tell you that the media doesn’t make a dime to
promote or talk about the cancer treatments that Dr. Kelley used. So the
media doesn’t talk about Dr. Kelley and his cancer treatments.
People trust the media, Congress, the FDA, the AMA, the
ACS, Big Pharma, etc. etc. with their lives, but these organizations
have betrayed the general public for the sake of great riches.
The truth is that the media and our politicians are gladly
controlled by the owners of the pharmaceutical industry; who are
multi-billionaires who couldn’t care less about the health, well-being
or lives of the “little people.”
It seems like everyone on earth wants a piece of the multi-billionaire’s pies. Except people like the late Dr. Kelley.
Well, there is more to it than that. Both the media, the
pharmaceutical industry, the major banks, etc. are owned by
multi-billionaires (and in at least one case – multi-trillionaires) who
are all buddy-buddy with each other. They all know each other. They even
have their own very exclusive clubs (e.g. the Bilderbergers). They are
totally loyal to each other, which is precisely why the media is loyal
to Big Pharma but not the common people.
Now let’s dig deeper into the tactics of the media to
understand why the media is so successful at controlling the minds of
the general public to the point that the general public won’t believe
the truth even when they hear it. Their tactics are highly
sophisticated.
The answer will take some explanation.
The Sophistication of the Media
So why do people run to their medical doctor, instead of to
the Internet or their local health food store, when they are first
diagnosed with cancer? Think about that for a moment before reading on.
The media controls the minds of the American people by
showing “medical doctors” on television every chance they get, as
already mentioned. Whether you are watching a movie, a drama, a sitcom, a
news program, a comedy or whatever, there will likely be a medical
doctor on the show at one time or another. Think about the Star Trek
movies, for example. Was there a medical doctor in those movies? Yes.
It is tit-for-tat. The pharmaceutical industry
gives money to the media for advertising and the media gives patients to
the medical community by glorifying medical doctors on television and
movies.
Furthermore, the general public thinks that Dr. Kelley, who
had the 93% cure rate, was a quack because he did not use
pharmaceutical industry drugs and he was not a medical doctor. It
doesn’t take a medical degree to tell cancer patients to take purple
grape juice, a quart of carrot juice (with a little beet juice mixed in)
or some other equally effective natural cancer treatment.
My point is that people trust their television to tell them
what to do when they get sick. When people get sick they run to their
doctor’s office because that is what television has conditioned them to
do.
The Savior of the world described this level of
brainwashing in two words: “whited sepulcher.” The media paints the
whitewash on the sepulcher (the general public only sees the whitewash)
and thus the general public has no idea what is inside the sepulcher or
that the sepulcher even exists. They can’t see the bodies behind the
television screen.
Running to their medical doctor, in many cases, is the
right thing to do. But in other cases (i.e. in the case of almost all
diseases), it is the wrong thing to do. Your doctor has no clue how to
cure cancer, AIDS, Alzheimers, Multiple Sclerosis, ALS, and many other
diseases. But there are people who do know how to deal with all of these
diseases using natural medicine.
What all of this means is that many, many
people intentionally promote and glorify ineffective treatments for
cancer in order to share in the massive wealth of the owners of the
pharmaceutical industry.
But to be very fair, most of the people who preach
chemotherapy and radiation have been fooled themselves and they don’t
know the truth.
The nurses, the newscasters, the politicians. etc., like
everyone else, also get their information from the media and their
doctors.
The American Medical Association (AMA) is really nothing
but a labor union. The AMA jumped in bed with the new pharmaceutical
industry in 1907 and agreed to use the treatments that were most
profitable for them, without any regard to the survival of their
patients.
This may sound harsh, but the evidence is overwhelming that
that is exactly what happened. The AMA had been corrupt long before
1907 and John D. Rockefeller, Sr., who started the drug companies to
make more money from his oil, was already known to be a ruthless
businessman who had a fantastic public relations department which
existed to make him look like a respectable citizen.
In fact, the father of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. advertised
himself as a “cancer doctor.” What did his father use to “cure cancer?”
Raw crude oil which obviously did not cure cancer.
There is no “war on cancer.” What there is is a bottomless pit of money into which many people put their hands to grab money.
Foundation for the Advancement of Cancer Therapy (FACT- tm)
The Foundation for the Advancement of Cancer Therapy (FACT –
tm) is pointing to a quarter century of research that brings into
question the decision cancer patients often make to undergo conventional
treatments, including radiation [1] and chemotherapy, in hopes of
prolonging life.
Drug company controlled news reports and popular thinking
have led cancer patients to believe that decades of research have
resulted in treatment practices that have improved cancer survival
rates.
But, FACT points to work by credible cancer researchers
that seem to fly in the face of this commonly held belief. The late Dr.
Hardin B. Jones, professor of medical physics and physiology at
Berkeley, Calif., conducted research spanning 25 years in the life of
cancer patients that led him to conclude that untreated cancer patients
[2] did not die sooner.
In fact, in many instances, they lived longer than those
undergoing conventional cancer treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy
[3] and radiation.
Professor Jones first presented his shocking research
results at the American Cancer Society’s Science Writers’ Seminar in
1969. His findings confirmed an earlier paper he wrote in 1955 that shed
doubt that common forms of treatment truly extended patient life.
In his earlier paper, Dr. Jones illustrated how cancer
study results were skewed to conclude that treated patients fared
better. For example, patients who died while receiving treatment were
not included in results, giving an unrealistically rosier picture of the
survival rate of treated patients.
In his 1969 presentation, the professor pointed out that
research continued to shift results in favor of treatment. For example,
patients whose cancer was extremely advanced were routinely placed in
the group not receiving treatment. This left more patients who were less
seriously impacted in the treated group, resulting in a higher survival
rate for that group.
Once this bias was statistically corrected, Dr. Jones found
that survival rate among untreated patients were actually greater than
among the patients undergoing treatment.
Dr. Jones was able to determine that survival among breast
cancer [4] sufferers was four times longer when conventional treatment
was refused. Such patients typically lived an average of 12 1/2 years,
compared with those undergoing treatment who lived only three years on
average, leading the cancer researcher to conclude that without doubt,
radical surgery did more harm to cancer patients than it did good.
Meanwhile FACT points out, there has been no published work
refuting the evidence presented by Dr. Jones. On the contrary, his
conclusions have been supported by the work of other recognized
researchers. Among them was Massachusetts Institute of Technology
biologist Dr. Maurice Fox who published his paper in 1979 stating that
radical mastectomy did not bring about better survival rates than simple
lump removal.
He also wrote that patients opting out of medical
procedures actually had a lower mortality rate than those who chose to
undergo treatment. Further, patients who received early diagnoses died
even sooner, likely due to duration and intensity of treatment.
Even those advocating conventional treatment as the best
choice for cancer patients cannot dismiss the toll such procedures take
on the body. Cancer patients opting to undergo such treatment plans must
cope with greater pain and suffering, often to the point where it
greatly impacts quality of life.
Patients undergoing conventional treatment can expect to
cope with an often horrific list of serious side effects, including
cancer growth and death. For example, as a known cancer-causing agent,
radiation can actually spread cancer and lead to deadly metastases. Left
untreated, however, the original cancerous tumor can often slow the
cancer’s spread.
Other common conditions that develop as a result of
treatment include hemorrhage, tissue death, compromised immunity, liver
failure [5], kidney dysfunction, blistering, prolonged vomiting,
disorientation, anorexia, enteritis, and bone marrow depression, among
other serious ills.
Bringing these researchers’ conclusions to light leaves
cancer patients with a more difficult decision-making process, but one
that may offer renewed choices. As always, patients ought to consult
with a trusted medical doctor and loved ones in formulating the decision
of whether or not to undergo treatments like radiation or chemotherapy.
As with many decisions they face, cancer patients will need
to review all information available to determine the best course of
action. Choosing a path that includes conventional treatment should be
done based on available scientifically-grounded evidence and personal
preference, not out of pressure or fear that avoiding treatment will
surely condemn the patient to a shorter life expectancy.
References:
http://www.rethinkingcancer.org/resources/magazine-articles/8_11-12/the-untreated-live-longer.php
http://www.naturalnews.com/012727_chemotherapy_cancer_treatments.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070409164224.htm
http://www.nj.com/healthfit/index.ssf/2014/07/rutgers_study_concludes_popular_prostate_cancer_treatment_largely_ineffective_in_elderly_patients.htm
http://www.rethinkingcancer.org/resources/magazine-articles/8_11-12/the-untreated-live-longer.php
http://www.naturalnews.com/012727_chemotherapy_cancer_treatments.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070409164224.htm
http://www.nj.com/healthfit/index.ssf/2014/07/rutgers_study_concludes_popular_prostate_cancer_treatment_largely_ineffective_in_elderly_patients.htm
See more at:
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/cancer_treatments/cancer-survival-rates-1124.html#sthash.BNH7GR69.dpuf
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/cancer_treatments/cancer-survival-rates-1124.html#sthash.BNH7GR69.dpuf
Learn about Liberty & Power, and finding liberty in
today’s world, especially in these most interesting times. Or here for
something ‘new’
http://excitingnewdirections.blogspot.com
http://excitingnewdirections.blogspot.com
“This fortress built by nature for herself…” Westcliffe…facing Coming Hard Times
Interested in freedom & Liberty?
http://www.isil.org/resources/philosophy-of-liberty-index.html
Interested in freedom & Liberty?
http://www.isil.org/resources/philosophy-of-liberty-index.html
Links:
[1] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/vitamin_c/radiation_exposure.html
[2] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/cancer_treatments/natural_cure.html
[3] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/vitamin_c/kills_cancer_cells.html
[4] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/cancer_treatments/nbcam_events.html
[5] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/nutrition_news/ala_liver.html
[1] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/vitamin_c/radiation_exposure.html
[2] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/cancer_treatments/natural_cure.html
[3] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/vitamin_c/kills_cancer_cells.html
[4] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/cancer_treatments/nbcam_events.html
[5] http://www.naturalhealth365.com/nutrition_news/ala_liver.html
The last link explains how an ALA (Alpha Lipoic Acid) I.V.
can cure liver failure. Here is Dr. Berkson’s website for more
information:
Dr. Berkson’s Website
Dr. Berkson’s Website
Here is the protocol (subject to change):
300 mg of alpha-lipoic acid twice a day
300 mg of milk thistle or ‘silymarin’ twice a day
200 mcg of selenium twice a day
300 mg of alpha-lipoic acid twice a day
300 mg of milk thistle or ‘silymarin’ twice a day
200 mcg of selenium twice a day
It also was recommended not to eat more than four (4)
ounces of meat per day – and to consume some branched-chain amino acids
each day.
Final Comments About Big Pharma, the FDA, AMA, etc.
Because the major owners of Big Pharma are the most evil
people who have ever lived on this earth, it should not be surprising
that they hire the mafia to kill people who cut into their profits. See
this article while it is till up:
Is Big Pharma Murdering Our Cutting-Edge Doctors?
Is Big Pharma Murdering Our Cutting-Edge Doctors?
Who wants to go to hell with them? I guess the money is good enough that a lot of people want to go to hell with them.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and American Medical
Association (AMA) have jointly or individually “legally” shut down many
clinics of cancer researchers who knew how to cure cancer. They have
also shut down vendors of products which were highly effective against
cancer. They also scare other vendors who pretty-much have to go into
hiding.
What if the FDA opened a cancer treatment center that used
all of the natural cancer treatments they have shut down and some that
are common knowledge which they did not shut down? What would the cure
rate of this clinic be on newly diagnosed cancer patients??
The cure rate would be 100%.
Thus, both the FDA and AMA CANNOT CLAIM they do not know
how to cure cancer. If they make such a claim they are lying, which is
what they seem to do best.
Both the FDA and AMA KNOW how to cure cancer.. They just
choose not to cure cancer and they choose to sit by and do nothing
(except persecute or murder people who know how to cure cancer) while
hundreds of thousands of Americans die every year because they trusted
the medical associations, pharmaceutical industry, media, Congress,
corrupt charities, ad nauseum.
Is God stupid? They think that God is stupid. But God is
not stupid, He designed human DNA and the DNA for thousands of other
species.
So if God is not stupid a lot of people are going to have a really bad day on Judgment Day.
INVT Solar Pump Inverter
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Contact : tawanai@atrc.net.pk 92-331-2036-422 |
|||||||||
The 8th International Conference on Information Technology. Jordan.
The 8th International Conference on Information Technology, ICIT 2017 is a forum for scientists, engineers, and practitioners to present their latest research results, ideas, developments, and applications in all areas of Information Technology. ICIT 2017 is being organized at Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan (ZUJ), Jordan, in a joint effort with Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Malaysia. It will be held at ZUJ campus. You are invited to submit a paper or abstract to ICIT 2017 (http://icit.zuj.edu.jo/). ICIT 2017 is technically sponsored by IEEE. Accepted papers will be published and indexed by IEEE Xplore and Scopus. Extended versions of the conference best papers will be evaluated to be published in journals that will be announced later. · This is a non-profit conference. · Free Registration. · One author of each accepted paper will enjoy a full board hosting in Jordan (for non-Jordanian authors) during the conference for 3 days. Regards, ICIT17 Team General Chair: Prof. Abdelfatah A. Tamimi Dean, Faculty of Science and IT Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Tel: +962-6-4291511 Ext: 335 it@zuj.edu.jo
LED Light
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
