Sunday, June 26, 2011

Halal White sugar

http://www.vegsource.com/jo/qa/qasugar.htm

I am interested in making and sustaining a company which supplies Halal White sugar.

All those interested can contact me on the following :


--
Khawar Nehal

Applied Technology Research Center (ATRC)
C-55 Block A KDA Officers, Karachi 75260, Pakistan
Email : khawar.nehal@atrc.net.pk
Website : http://atrc.net.pk
Mobile : 971-55-639-8386
Gtalk : khawar.nehal
Skype : khawar.nehal

Internet Wadi
http://atrc.net.pk/iw/home.html
http://www.internetwadi.com

Cybercoffee
Shop 13 Building T1, Spain Cluster, International City, Dubai, UAE.
Email : cybercoffee@atrc.net.pk

Dubai Business Club
Website : http://dubai-business.co.cc/

Social Networks
General email : khawar.nehal@gmail.com
Salam BC : http://www.salambc.com/profile/khawar_nehal
Linked In : http://www.linkedin.com/in/khawarnehal
Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/root.sysop

Dubai Airports CEO: Aviation model is broken

Dubai Airports CEO: Aviation model is broken

by ASC Guest Columnist on Aug 9, 2010


Paul Griffiths.
Paul Griffiths.

A growing need for pro-aviation policy, partnership and global perspective - written by Paul Griffiths, chief executive officer of Dubai Airports.

Airlines around the world have lost around US$50 billion since 2001, which clearly indicates that the present business model in completely and utterly broken.

As the aviation industry works to repair this situation, governments worldwide should also take a look at Dubai’s aviation model to stem the flow of red ink and improve the financial sustainability of an industry that generates 8% of global GDP.

After all, Dubai has a thriving aviation sector that features the third busiest airport for international passenger and cargo traffic, the world’s largest single airport retail operation and one of the fastest growing and most profitable airlines on the planet.

Last year, while global aviation recorded the worst demand decline in post-war years, Dubai International recorded 9.2% passenger traffic growth, making it the world’s fastest growing major international airport.

Annual passenger numbers are forecast to grow from 41 million in 2009 to 98 million in 2020 and 150 million passengers by 2030. With this in mind, the emirate’s approach can provide some valuable insight to counterparts throughout the world.

There are three primary factors behind Dubai’s success – a pro-aviation government policy, industry-government partnership and a vision that embraces the changing industry dynamics driven by globalisation.

At the end of the day, most governments around the world treat aviation as a pariah and choke its growth with costly, misdirected regulation and parasitic forms of taxation, whose revenues usually flow straight out of the sector.

Sadly, the UK government is top-in-class in this regard. The Air Passenger Duty serves only to pad the Treasury’s coffers.

And its recent decision to stop the construction of a third runway at Heathrow effectively snuffs out the considerable economic growth aviation can drive in an already beleaguered economy. Dubai has done the exact opposite.

Aviation generates 25% of the emirate’s GDP - a fact that has led to its inclusion in Dubai’s strategic plan and a long-standing open skies policy. Allegations of a tax free environment are correct – but we aren’t the only tax free environment in the world and the policy applies to all companies operating in Dubai.

Emirates Airline is run as a fully commercial business and treated like any other airline at Dubai International in terms of airport and landing charges. The airport is government owned, however, it is run efficiently, it is cash positive and revenues generated are re-invested into infrastructure.

The alignment of government agencies and industry partners has also boosted growth and efficiency as resource planning, facility investment and expansion are coordinated and supportive of airline growth strategies and fleet acquisition plans.

In addition, greater collaboration, information sharing and use of existing technologies across the aviation value chain is also needed to streamline airport processes, improve the customer experience and boost retail revenues.


Almost 50% of the time a customer spends at an airport is absorbed by cumbersome processes - at an opportunity cost as high as US$35 billion per annum.

This lost revenue ultimately stems from a chronic lack of trust and cooperation between airlines, airports and retailers. It’s high time for all parties to acknowledge their inter-dependence and leverage their strengths.

This could lead to an environment where the travel retail industry records greater profits, airports fund themselves entirely from non-aeronautical income, and airlines are relieved of the burden of airport charges.

In the UK and other mature European markets, limited space, congestion and a stifling regulatory environment have all but capped airport expansion.

By contrast, in just three airports in the Middle East, investment in airport infrastructure is expected to reach $39 billion over the next 10 years.

And while the formula for change is apparent, a lack of trust often impedes progress. Industry partners must learn to cooperate and coordinate activities to better bring their individual strengths to the table.

Governments must adopt policies that support liberalisation and sustainable growth. And both must commit to developing a lasting partnership that recognises the changing face of our industry and seeks the greatest efficiencies from an evolving global network.

Dubai Airports CEO issues capacity warning by Robeel Haq on Jun 13, 2011

Air traffic capacity constraints pose the single largest threat to aviation growth and the billions of dollars of additional economic activity its expansion is expected to generate in the Middle East and globally over the next decade, according to Dubai Airports CEO Paul Griffiths.

“In Dubai, aircraft movements are now five times more numerous than 25 years ago, growing from 63,000 in 1985 to over 307,000 in 2010,” said Griffiths in a speech delivered to air traffic management executives attending the Civil Air Navigation Services Organization’s (CANSO) annual general meeting being held in Bangkok yesterday. “By 2020 aircraft movements will surpass 560,000 and passenger numbers will climb to 98.5 million. Unfortunately, the airspace is currently not configured to support the growth and capacity bottlenecks are looming on the horizon. We have an outdated route structure, fragmented airspace and there is a lack of effective coordination on a regional scale.”

Traffic growth is expected to generate significant economic expansion. In Dubai alone, aviation supports 250,000 jobs and $22 billion in economic activity, according to the results of a recently released study conducted by leading global research firm Oxford Economics. By 2020 aviation is projected to support 373,000 jobs – or 22% of the total employment in Dubai – and $45.4 billion in economic activity – or 32% of GDP.

Dubai is not alone in its recognition of the value of aviation. Airlines and airports across the Middle East are investing heavily in aircraft and infrastructure expansion to capture the value of the anticipated growth. Arab countries plan to spend nearly $200 billion on new aircraft in the next 15 years to meet demand. And more than $100 billion has been committed to airport expansion, more than half of which is in the UAE itself.

“Previously most of aviation’s congestion problems have existed on the ground, now the biggest strategic threat to the growth of aviation is in the air,” said Griffiths. “There are several root causes for this malaise. The external factors start with nationalism and politics getting in the way of logic. There is needless concern over sovereignty issues which have long been overcome elsewhere. Another is an outdated regulatory environment which is not supporting the new order of aviation where airspace is viewed as a global commodity, not a local product. Finally, airspace management is being seen by other parts of the industry as a black art, not a vital part of the supply chain and is therefore not properly integrated.”

Griffiths added that internal factors, such as a lack of strategic planning among air navigation service providers and the general absence of long term commitment and investment, are equally disconcerting.

To avoid constraining aviation’s growth locally, Dubai Airports is finalising a detailed strategy to expand airspace capacity over the next decade. Measures include adjusting the sequencing of arrivals and departures, redesigning route structures and making better use of technologies such as performance based navigation and communication navigation and surveillance systems which help aircraft fly more efficiently. Dubai Airports is also leading a joint Middle East Airspace Study, in coordination with CANSO, UAE General Civil Aviation Authority and Dubai Civil Aviation Authority, to work across borders to optimise the region’s airspace structure.

“There is a critical gap between politics and operations at both government and operating levels in presenting the compelling economic case for an efficient airspace environment,” concluded Griffiths. “We simply cannot wait for the political wheels to grind so slowly. We have to recognise that working together is the only way forward.”

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Basic rent and percentage calculation.

The following reviews the various methods of calculating percentage rental, and the administrative provisions pertaining to percentage rental payments by retailers under percentage rent leases.

Methods of Calculation

There are several different methods of calculating percentage rental for retailers. Payment of a specific percentage of gross sales with a guaranteed minimum rent is probably the most common. This method of calculation is generally effected by language obligating the tenant to pay "percentage rental equal to five percent (5%) of the tenant's gross sales less the minimum rental payable under the lease."

Another method of percentage rent calculation is to provide for a minimum rental with payment of a percentage of gross sales over a stipulated breakpoint or breakpoints. Language effecting a stipulated breakpoint would obligate the tenant to "pay percentage rental equal to five percent (5%) of all gross sales in excess of annual sales above the sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000)."

The stipulated breakpoint method for the purpose of calculating percentage rental can be dangerous when partial years are involved. This method, unless the lease provides otherwise, may allow the tenant to have gross sales at a rate greater than the break point for a partial year under the lease, and avoid paying percentage rent for that partial year, since the stipulated breakpoint is not exceeded for the short year.

In the event a stipulated break point is used to calculate percentage rent, the tenant may wish to insist upon a provision that reduces the breakpoint in the event the rental for the premises is reduced, e.g., in the case of a partial condemnation of the premises occupied by the tenant.

There is really no requirement that a stipulated breakpoint relate directly to a mathematical breakpoint for the calculation of percentage rental. Of course, the mathematical breakpoint is calculated by dividing the minimum rent by the percentage of gross sales the tenant is obligated to pay. For example, if the minimum rental for the premises is $50,000 per year and the tenant is paying 5% of sales, then the mathematical breakpoint is $l million. However, the parties could agree that the minimum rent would start at higher than $1 million, e.g., $1.25 million. This is sometimes called a "skip," since a portion of the gross sales against which percentage rent is calculated is "skipped", i.e., that portion between $1 million and $1.25 million.

The same result could be achieved by using a "split" percentage approach. The term "split" percentage deal comes from the use of two percentage figures, the first to calculate the breakpoint, and the second to fix the amount of percentage rent payable for sales in excess of the breakpoint. For example, in a "split" 4%/5% deal, the breakpoint would be calculated by dividing 4 percent into the minimum rental of $50,000 to yield a breakpoint of $1.25 million above which the tenant would pay 5 percent of gross sales as percentage rent.

Finally, sometimes tenants negotiate different percentage rates for increments of annual sales. For example, the tenant might agree to pay 5 percent on sales between $1 million and $2 million, and 4 percent on sales above $2 million. Frequently, this sort of agreement results from a compromise between a landlord who wants 5 percent of sales as percentage rent and a tenant who wants 4 percent of sales payable as percentage rent.

The last method of calculation is by far the least prevalent--it is the "straight percentage" or "percentage only" deal which obligates the tenant to pay solely a percentage of gross sales as rental with no fixed minimum rental. It is usually only used with major anchors for regional shopping centers or anchors for community shopping centers. Suffice it to say that substantial tenant leverage is required to obtain a straight percentage deal. The main nuance associated with this type of deal is the possibility of an implied operating covenant (i.e., a covenant to conduct business continuously in the premises) for the tenant in many jurisdictions, unless the lease provides expressly otherwise. Courts may imply this sort of covenant since the landlord will receive no rent if the tenant ceases to operate, even though the tenant has the continued occupancy of the premises.

Definition of Gross Sales and Exclusions

Generally, landlord-oriented percentage rent leases have an expansive definition of gross sales. Such sales are typically calculated by utilizing "the actual sales price of all goods, services and merchandise sold, delivered or licensed in the premises by the tenant, or by any subtenants or concessionaires, whether they are made for cash or on credit." Tenants generally seek relief from such broad definitions by proposing to exclude a number of items from the base against which percentage rental is calculated. Common exclusions include:

  • sales or excise taxes payable the tenant to taxing authorities;
  • proceeds from the sale of gift certificates until redeemed for service or merchandise;
  • labor charges for incidental services in the premises, e.g., charges for Christmas wrapping;
  • all credits and refunds given or made to customers for returns of merchandise;
  • all sums received in settlement for lost or damaged merchandise;
  • sales of machinery, equipment, trade fixtures not made in the ordinary course of the tenant's business;
  • sales to employees at a discount (often with a maximum amount for such sales);
  • incidental receipts by the tenant (e.g., vending or stamp machine receipts, receipts from public telephones, proceeds from the sale of money orders, and receipts from video games, although frequently landlords are not willing to exclude video game revenue since it can be substantial).
  • charges paid directly to credit card issuers.

Record Keeping and Rights of Audit

Frequently, provisions in the lease requiring the tenant to maintain records pertaining to percentage rental are onerous from an administrative point of view, especially for chain store retailers. National tenants frequently balk at rules requiring percentage rental records to be kept on the premises of the store rather than at the home office for the retailer. Further, national tenants frequently object to language which requires them to retain sales slips, bank deposits, tapes from cash registers, or other point of sale reports from business machines located on the premises. In addition, many percentage rent provisions require the chief financial officer of the tenant to certify percentage rent reports submitted by the tenant. Generally, national tenants will not agree to such certification requirements, but will agree to furnish sales reports to the landlord with a reasonable amount of detail.

Other questions pertaining to record keeping for percentage rental include:

  • Are separate records required for subtenants and concessionaires?
  • Is the tenant required to submit backup data for statements of percentage rent if requested by the landlord?
  • Must the tenant furnish copies of audits to the landlord that the tenant has performed or copies of sales tax returns to verify gross sales?
  • Can the landlord audit the tenant's records concerning gross sales and is there a cutoff period by which this audit must be performed?
  • Is there a "penalty assessment" that is payable in the event the tenant has underpaid percentage rental as disclosed by an audit?
  • Is the tenant required to pay the cost of an audit if the sales are found to be understated by a certain percentage, e.g., three percent?
  • What is the retention period during which the tenant must retain sales records for audit by the landlord?

Timing of Payment

The mechanics of payment of percentage rental really are cash flow issues between the landlord and the tenant. The landlord wants percentage rental paid as soon and as often as possible, and the tenant wants just the opposite. Generally, tenants try to modify percentage rental provisions to provide for payment of any percentage rental due within thirty days following the end of the lease year. Landlords often dislike lump sum annual percentage rental payment because of its adverse impact on cash flow. Frequent compromises on the manner of payment include:

  • payment semiannually within thirty days; or
  • payment on a quarterly basis within thirty days; or
  • payment monthly after the breakpoint is exceeded by the tenant's gross sales within fifteen days following the end of the month.

New signature with updated businesses.

Khawar Nehal

Applied Technology Research Center (ATRC)
C-55 Block A KDA Officers, Karachi 75260, Pakistan
Email : khawar.nehal@atrc.net.pk
Website : http://atrc.net.pk
Mobile : 971-55-639-8386
Gtalk : khawar.nehal
Skype : khawar.nehal

Internet Wadi
http://atrc.net.pk/iw/home.html
http://www.internetwadi.com

Cybercoffee
Shop 13 Building T1, Spain Cluster, International City, Dubai, UAE.
Email : cybercoffee@atrc.net.pk

Dubai Business Club
Website : http://dubai-business.co.cc/

Social Networks
General email : khawar.nehal@gmail.com
Salam BC : http://www.salambc.com/profile/khawar_nehal
Linked In : http://www.linkedin.com/in/khawarnehal
Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/root.sysop

Dubai inspectors fine 113 Dragon Mart stores for counterfeit goods


Inspectors impose Dh100,000 in fines on 113 stores at Dragon Mart for violations

  • By Deena Kamel YousefStaff Reporter
  • Published: 00:00 June 23, 2011
  • Gulf News

Dubai: The Dubai Government appears to have taken a zero-tolerance policy against fake products with officials seizing a large chunk of counterfeits.

During a recent raid on Dragon Mart, the Department of Economic Development (DED) seized 2,500 fake goods from the popular Chinese market in Dubai, according to a DED official.

The inspectors imposed Dh100,000 in fines on 113 stores found violating intellectual property rights, Abdullah Al Shehi, Director of Commercial Protection, told Gulf News.

Bags, shoes, clothes

The counterfeit products included bags, shoes and clothes imitating high-end brands such as Louis Vuitton, Chanel and Crocs, he said.

The Chinese knock-offs will meet their demise in a large shredder at the back of a van near the DED's Al Qusais offices and the remains will be recycled.

The DED began an awareness campaign against counterfeit products targeting Dragon Mart at the beginning of the year.

Copyright

The campaign and brochures were all in Mandarin in an attempt to educate vendors on copyright laws, he added.

Earlier this year, the DED destroyed 453,000 fake goods it confiscated last year.

The department issues warnings, imposes fines ranging from Dh5,000 to Dh20,000, and closes the establishments of repeat offenders for up to 90 days.

Trading in fake goods is especially popular in Bur Dubai markets, but the free zones are also potential entry points for the products into the country.

Counterfeit costs $600 billion a year

It is estimated that counterfeiting costs $600 billion a year globally, according to the International Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition (IACC).

Approximately five to seven per cent of world trade is in counterfeit goods, the IACC estimates.

Consumers can file complaints about counterfeit goods by logging on to www.consumerrights.ae or dialling the complaints hotline on 600-54-5555.

Friday, June 17, 2011

Old gadgets competition

Do you have a dead gadget or the one that is not usable?

Well here comes the chance to use it and make something of it.

All you need is creativity and skill to make something out of these unused products.

Spider Magazine is organizing a competition named Tech Recycle Competition in which you can take part and get a chance to win Gizmos.

Competition is organized for The Young Leaders Conference and the winners will be selected on the basis of entries’ innovativeness, practicality, strategy and presentation.

Winners will be announced at The Young Leaders Conference.

Age Limit:

  • Tech Recycle Competition is open only to students aged between 18 and 24.

Last Date of Submission:

  • Deadline for all entries is 6:00 pm on June 20, 2011

Application forms can be downloaded here.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Hope for Glaucoma

Optic Nerve Axon Growth

  • print

  • Share

Larry Benowitz, PhD, of Children’s Hospital in Boston, MA, and also on faculty at Harvard Medical School, has completed a study that aims to stimulate the damaged optic nerve to regenerate its axons.

Dr. Benowitz and his team wanted to know what molecules would stimulate trophic (growth activating) factors that would encourage ganglion cell fiber growth. There was one molecule in particular the team was excited about. With strong suspicions that it would do the trick, they injected this molecule, as well as other molecules, and monitored the different responses. What Dr. Benowitz referred to as their "favorite molecule" produced good results, but so did many other molecules. The task then was to figure out what was producing the growth response.

After retracing their steps, the team found that it really didn’t matter what was being injected. It turned out that the lens injury caused by injecting the molecule, and not the molecule itself, was responsible for triggering the desired response.

Lens Injury Causes Axon Growth

The lens injury was producing an inflammatory response. This, in turn, provoked macrophage infiltration into the vitreous humor (the gel in the back of the eye). These macrophages are generally thought to have an adverse effect. However, in this case, at least some of them seem to be putting out trophic factors that contribute to the growth of retinal ganglion cell fibers.

Since damage to the lens is not clinically practical, the team then began to look for other ways to evoke this response. One way was to introduce a cell wall preparation from yeast. By doing this, they were able to produce axon growth without damaging the lens.

Dr. Benowitz says, "We’re not the first to discover that axons from retinal ganglion cells are able to regenerate. But it was always thought the regeneration could not penetrate the scar tissue created by the injury." He goes on, "Up to this point, it was thought that it [the scar tissue] was an impenetrable barrier." Almost all of the surviving retinal ganglion cells in the study reverted to growth mode. While these axons did not actually establish structural continuity and function, a fair number were able to extend through the injury site and down on to the optic nerve.

Importance for the Future of Glaucoma Treatment

Vision loss caused by glaucoma is a direct result of damage to the optic nerve. As we’ve said, there has never been (and still isn’t) a way to repair the optic nerve once damage is done. The best course of action for glaucoma has always been early detection and treatment to prevent further damage. However, since glaucoma has virtually no signs or symptoms, too often glaucoma is not discovered until damage has already occurred.

Even though once detected, most cases of glaucoma are controlled with medication or surgery, it remains the second leading cause of blindness in America. An estimated 3 million Americans have glaucoma, and of those, only half know they have it. This means that 1.5 million people may experience irreversible loss of vision because their glaucoma will go untreated, making the ability to repair the nerve vitally important.

What Comes Next?

While we are yet years from practical application of these findings, this research provides great hope for the future. Hope exists not only for glaucoma patients but also for other neurological diseases. Next steps involve further refining the process. We must know exactly which molecules are causing the growth to occur as well as which ones interfere.

Once researchers refine what is needed to help the axon grow, they need to determine if those axons can navigate properly and get where they need to go. Scientists have only just begun to look into this area. This research also has not yet been conducted on the human eye.

Dr. Benowitz states, "We need to find out who are the good guys and who are the bad guys and then figure out how to tip the balance to stimulate nerve cell growth." He goes on, "The question is not, can the nerve cell regenerate its axon, because clearly it can. We just need to identify the right stimuli that will get the neuron thinking it’s back in its youth and start growing again." We look forward to a future fountain of youth (so to speak) for optic nerve cell axons.

Last reviewed on April 19, 2011

Was this helpful? Yes No

CEBIT Opportunity via TDAP


Monday, June 6, 2011

How to Treat Glaucoma With Gingko Biloba


From : http://www.livestrong.com/article/372953-how-to-treat-glaucoma-with-gingko-biloba/



Overview

Glaucoma is an eye disease that damages the optic nerve due to introcular pressure, causing vision impairment and possibly blindness as a result. Glaucoma sets in gradually and you may not notice vision loss until it has developed to an advanced stage. Standard treatment for glaucoma includes prescribed eye drops, oral medications and surgery. However, according to Steven Bratman, author of "Collins Alternative Health Guide," you can treat glaucoma by taking ginkgo biloba. Ginkgo biloba is a large tree native to China. Its leaves have over 40 flavonoids and terpenoids that make them effective for treating a variety of conditions. Always consult your doctor before taking any alternative treatment.

Step 1

Purchase only a standardized extract of ginkgo biloba at your pharmacy or health food store. A standardized ginkgo biloba extract should contain 24 percent of ginkgo flavone glycosides.

Step 2

Take a 120mg dose of the ginkgo extract daily with a meal. One capsule of the extract should provide a full dose.

Step 3

Continue to take the dosage for at least eight weeks to see an significant improvement in your visual field.


About this Author

Joe Lewis started writing professionally in 2010 for various websites. He holds a Master of Science in nutrition and dietetics.